Alloy Steel expands into Indonesia

Special message from our sponsor to visitors from iHub:

If you don't want everything in your portfolio tanking at the same time during the next market correction, you may want to consider adding some selective shorting (or put buying). See Short Screen to screen for companies predicted to go bankrupt by their Altman Z-scores.

You may remember that the Altman scores accurately predicted both AYSI's survival and VBDG's demise

Alloy Steel International (OTC BB: AYSI.OB) filed this 8-K today:

Quantum Leap for New Super Alloy

High demand for new Super Alloy Arcoplate products has prompted Alloy Steel International to expand their operations into Indonesia by the appointment of a company to carry out functions on its behalf and under its direction.

The first overseas engineering office, based in Jakarta, will house both marketing staff and engineering professionals.

The Indonesian capital was chosen as the hub of operations due to its proximity to the expanding South-east Asian market, the lower manufacturing costs and the availability of highly qualified technical staff.

Possible sites for the manufacturing facility are undergoing analysis regarding capital costs of construction and fit out.

The Arcoplate Super Alloy, released in July this year, can be manufactured thinner thus lighter and more durable than older white iron type products. A one inch Arcoplate Super Alloy plate can replace white iron products up to six inches thick. Successful laboratory tests and field trials have shown cost and energy savings by reducing friction, greater ease of handling, and less production shutdown time for plate replacements.

Mining clientele have indicated they will specify Arcoplate in their plant expansions, upgrades and in new mining and mineral processing applications worldwide. The new thicker sizes are in heavy demand worldwide.

The new Indonesian branch of Alloy Steel International will cater for clients extending their mining operations into Indonesia and will allow for further expansion into the Chinese, Indian and Mongolian markets.

Alloy Steel International Chairman, Mr Gene Kostecki, estimates that once the company has the facility to service the Indonesian market from a local base, demand for Arcoplate in Indonesia could exceed $10 million per annum.

There was some question on Alloy Steel's i-Hub message board about whether this is a licensing deal or not. I suspect it isn't, but I sent an e-mail to the CEO asking if he could clarify. If I hear back from him, I'll update this post accordingly.

Update: Alloy Steel International's CEO Gene Kostecki responded via e-mail saying that this was not a licensing deal. He said the company was avoiding those out of concerns about protecting its intellectual property, which he said was the company's highest priority. He said that this expansion would enable AYSI to take advantage of Indonesia's lower labor costs and proximity to markets in China and India. If I get his permission to do so, I will quote his e-mail verbatim here, but those were the key points.

Second Update: I have his permission, so here's his e-mail:

Dear David:

We are all very excited with our expansion program into South East Asia as it will give the company a great stepping stone into the entire ASEAN Market which is one of the fastest growing economies in the world.

The new government in Indonesia is fast tracking all economic development and investment in Indonesia. With Indonesia’s low labour costs and proximity to China and India it will place the company in a very competitive position to capitalize on Asian markets in this part of the world without sacrificing quality and margins, yet still being price competitive against low end products that portray themselves as wear plate.

David, we do not see the need to enter into any licensing agreements with any third party as this could potentially compromise our position in protecting our intellectual property rights in this part of the world. Protecting our intellectual property rights is the company's top priority.

Sincerely,

Gene Kostecki

BRIC Versus CRIB

In an op/ed in yesterday's Financial Times, Michael Hudson, an economics professor at the University of Missouri, ventriloquized the thoughts of foreign opponents of the United States, while warning of ominous consequences from the summit in Russia this week of the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) ("Washington Cannot Call all the Shots"):

Many foreigners see the US as a lawless nation. How else to characterise a country that holds out a set of laws for others – on war, debt repayment and the treatment of prisoners – but ignores them itself?

[...]

It is no mystery to other countries how the US remains above the law. Foreigners see a financial system backed by American military bases encircling the globe. The IMF, World Bank, World Trade Organisation and other Washington surrogates are seen as vestiges of a lost American empire no longer able to rule by economic strength, left only with military domination. They see this hegemony cannot continue without adequate revenues and are attempting to hasten the bankruptcy of the US financial-military world order.

[...]

US officials wanted to attend Yekaterinburg as observers. They were told no. It is a word that Americans will hear much more in the future.

Mark Chandler, Global Currency Strategist at Brown Brothers Harriman, had a slightly different take on this summit recently ("Bric or Crib?"):

Brazil, Russia, India and China, now collectively known as the BRICs, will hold a summit in Russia on June 16th. Besides the Goldman Sachs invented moniker, these countries have very little in common except for the fact that they believe, to seemingly varying degrees of intensity, that they deserve greater influence in the conduct of world affairs than they currently have. And given the enormity of US power, as hard-core realists, they know any increase in their power and influence will come at the expense of America’s.

[...]

One of the most important reasons why the BRICs do not have the economic clout that they would like is frankly they don’t deserve it. Goldman-Sachs had a story (and more) to sell with its BRICs concept, but those same letters spell a real word, CRIB. The point is that the countries, outside of China, are not among the largest.

According to Bloomberg data, at the end of last year, China was the fourth largest economy ($3.2 trillion), behind the US, Japan, and Germany. This of course takes the Chinese data at face value, and given the often large gaps between energy production and reported GDP growth, as well as the amazing consistency of the pace of growth, many often cast a suspicious eye on Chinese data.

With a GDP of $1.3 trillion in 2008, Brazil was the 10th largest economy, though it is roughly half the size of France, which is the 6th largest economy. Russia and India were neck-and-neck for 11th and 12th places with each having produced about $1.2 trillion of goods and services last year. Spain’s economy is nearly 20% bigger than Russia’s and India’s, and it is the 8th largest economy. Together the BRICs account for a little more than 12% of the world’s GDP, and China alone accounts for half of that.

Green Energy from Bad Debt?

Professor Yu's idea to transfer some Asian holdings of U.S. Treasuries into an infrastructure fund, which we mentioned in a recent post ("The Latest Warning from China about the U.S. Dollar and Debt"), reminded me of another proposal related to infrastructure and sovereign debt. An article a couple of weeks ago in the Financial Times ("‘Green’ plan to consign Argentina’s debt woes to history") described a proposal by Argentine lawyer Pablo Giancaterino to assuage the hold-outs of Argentina's 2005 debt swap and give Argentina access to the international bond market by closing the books on litigation associated with its default in 2001. According to the FT, Mr. Giancaterino

[P]roposes creating a trust into which hold-outs would deposit the verdicts won against Argentina, in essence “freezing” them, but leaving them as a guarantee that they could be executed if Argentina defaulted on the new deal.

The trust would issue investors with certificates of participation tradable in New York.

Argentina would receive the old bonds and all it would pay would be interest, with a 66 per cent so-called “haircut” on the original capital, similar to the 2005 swap that hold-outs rejected as too cheap.

Interest would be paid into the trust, which would be obliged to invest the funds in tax-free energy and infrastructure projects for 11 years. Those investments would generate returns to pay back the hold-outs without them having to accept a haircut.

The image above, of the Agua del Toro hydroelectric dam in Argentina, comes from Industcards.com.