Insurance against Catastrophic Failure

An interesting suggestion by Yale School of Management professor Jonathan Koppell in today's NY Times (Op-Ed Contributor - "A Failure Tax"): companies that are "too big to fail" ought to pay premiums for catastrophic risk insurance that would fund their rescue in the event they are at risk of failure. There would be all sorts of challenges in implementing this in practice (e.g., Which firms would be covered? How much should the premiums be?, etc.), and Koppell briefly touches on them, but in principle, it's an idea worthy of consideration.

A Tall, Cool Drink of... Sewage?

Tomorrow's NY Times Magazine has a general interest article by Elizabeth Royte on the processing of sewage into drinking water, "A Tall, Cool Drink of... Sewage?". The article notes that the reprocessed water is purer (as measured by "T.D.S.", "total dissolved solids") than reservoir water (or even bottled spring water), and yet then Orange County, California treatment plant she profiles pumps the treated water into a reservoir where it filters through sand and gravel for a few months before being pumped into taps by utilities:

In other words, nature messes up the expensively reclaimed water. So why stick it back into the ground? “We do it for psychological reasons,” says Adam Hutchinson, director of recharge operations for the water district. “In the future, people will laugh at us for putting it back in, instead of just drinking it.”

Some have said that the scarcity of potable water in many parts of the world represents a macro trend from which investors can profit, perhaps by investing in the companies that build wastewater treatment plants, or some of the equipment those plants use. I haven't done much homework in this, but I plan to look into it at some point.

Update: Today's NY Times Business Section includes a related article, The Feed: "Can Israel Find the Water it Needs?". The article mentions an Israeli multinational, Netafim, that's active in drip irrigation as well as wastewater treatment and other water resources areas, but it isn't publicly traded.

Also, reader SL directed my attention to this article in the current Barron's, about American Water Works (NYSE: AWK), "The Spigot Reopens at American Water Works".

On Being a Recovering Political Junkie

My father got me a subscription to Time Magazine when I was in elementary school, and that was the beginning of the addiction. The op/ed page was always my favorite part of the newspaper, whether that paper was our local Bergen Record, the New York Times, or the Wall Street Journal. In recent years, RealClearPolitics, which aggregates opinion pieces from various newspapers, magazines and websites, became a favorite website of mine. I spent a lot of time reading editorials and op/ed columns, occasionally commenting on them, and engaging in vigorous debates with those who held different points of view. I enjoyed these debates, but most of the time I was simply frustrated, reading ideologues trade volleys on issues while (for the most part) avoiding the seemingly obvious (at least to me), pragmatic compromises.

Recently, I had two epiphanies I should have had a long time ago:

1. As much as I enjoyed a good argument or debate, this wasn't a profitable use of my time.
   
2. Instead of being frustrated by policies I disagreed with, I could find ways to profit from them through investing.

Since then, although I still glance at the op/ed pages of the WSJ and the NY Times, both of which I subscribe to (the NY Times just on weekends), I avoid political websites and blogs. Occasionally, when politics comes up on an investing website, I'll enter the fray, but otherwise, I've gone cold turkey. Good riddance. This has freed up time to research investment ideas, pursue business opportunities and otherwise make better use of my time. I still vote, of course, and have my own opinions, and I'd be happy to engage in good-natured debate others over drinks, next time the opportunity presents itself, but mostly avoiding politics has freed up a lot of my mental energy that I can put to better use elsewhere.