The Top Earning Degrees

A CNN Money article today lists the most lucrative undergraduate degrees (see the graphic above) and notes that, unsurprisingly, they all require math skills. A couple of thoughts on this. First, take a look at the first and third highest-paying degrees (petroleum and mining engineering, respectively). I've argued in the past for the economic benefits of facilitating more domestic natural resources production (e.g., here and here). One of the benefits I've noted is that natural resources extraction tends to create a lot of high-paying blue collar jobs. As this CNN article notes, it also creates high-paying professional jobs, which is another benefit.

Consider the benefits to California, for example, if it dropped its opposition to expanding offshore drilling. For one thing, it might improve the state's environment by reducing natural oil seepage. It would also generate much-needed royalty revenue for the state (in fact, the state could capture that revenue up front by issuing revenue bonds backed by those future royalty income streams). In addition, how many jobs would it create for petroleum engineers and oil rig workers? Couldn't California use the additional net tax payers and potential home buyers these workers would represent?

Another thought: given that the fifteen most lucrative college majors require math aptitude, does it make sense that the SAT has reduced the relative weight of its math section in the total SAT score from one half to one third (by adding an equal-weighed essay section to the math and verbal sections)?

Missing from McCain's Speech

Another area where there seems to be little daylight between the major party candidates is in the conceit that government-sponsored training or education is an all-purpose solution for economic advancement. McCain had a better real-life example of economic advancement in the audience, in his running mate's husband Todd Palin. Todd learned one of his trades from the company he worked for, BP -- not from a government-sponsored training program (I doubt he learned his other trade, commercial fishing, from a government program either). McCain could have used the opportunity to point out that allowing more domestic energy production will create more high-paying jobs like the one Todd Palin had, but I guess that would have conflicted with the line elsewhere in his speech where he made bogeymen of big oil companies.

Although increasing domestic energy exploration and production will create more high-paying jobs, of course it won't be a panacea either for those whose jobs are lost to outsourcing. That said, the idea that the government is going to retrain laid off workers for jobs that "won't go away" isn't serious. How would the government know what skills will be needed five or ten years down the road? A better approach from the government would be to enact policies that will encourage more companies to set up shop and hire people in this country.

Two New Jersey Plutocrats Join Forces to Oppose Offshore Drilling

Apparently, record-high energy prices haven't had the same effect on Jon Corzine and Frank Lautenberg as last week's Pew Poll noted they have had on a somewhat more representative sample of Americans. NJ Governor Corzine, the former Goldman Sachs chief, and U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg, D-NJ, one of the founders of ADP, got together with a couple of their less-affluent political colleagues in the Jersey Shore town of Belmar today to express their opposition to offshore drilling (The Record: "Corzine, others vow to fight offshore drilling").

On The Record's website, a lone commenter, "RamapoGuy" dissents from the Plutocrats' opinion on offshore drilling. After first noting that offshore rigs in the Gulf didn't spill oil even during Hurricane Katrina, he writes,

Alaskans get oil revenue checks each year..why can't we? We listened to the wackos in the 80's who said Nuclear energy would kill us all and now we are looking into Nuclear once more. If we would have ignored them back then, we would be in a better position today. We need to look at the current drilling technologies and start drilling something. We will always need oil so even if the oil is 10 years away, if we start exploring now, we will have it in 10 years. If we do nothing, we will have it never! Start drilling for oil and send a message to OPEC that we are starting to look elsewhere for oil.

Whom do you imagine has a better chance of getting his way on this, RamapoGuy or Jon Corzine and Frank Lautenberg? This is another reason to be confident in the secular bull market trend in oil continuing for another five years.